- AI Board Book Builder: Upload source documents and generate polished board books with summaries and risk scanning in seconds.
- Smart Risk Scanner: Detect risky language and compliance red flags across board materials automatically.
- Automated Minutes & Actions: Generate meeting minutes and convert discussions into trackable action items.
- Secure Collaboration: Role-based permissions, encryption, audit trails, and secure board messaging.
- Integrated Governance Hub: Voting, e-signatures, live streaming, training, and integrations with Microsoft 365, Google Docs, and DocuSign.
Diligent Board Management Software
AI-powered board management software for secure, efficient governance workflows
Updated February 27, 2026
Diligent Board Management Software Overview
Diligent Boards is an enterprise-grade, AI-powered board management platform designed to streamline governance workflows before, during, and after meetings. It automates board book creation, agenda building, minutes, and action tracking while maintaining rigorous security standards.
Used by 75% of the Fortune 500, Diligent helps boards save time, reduce risk, and make clearer, faster decisions with confidence.
Key Features
Pricing
Plan |
Price |
Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Diligent Boards (Board Management) | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | AI-powered board books, Secure document sharing, Agenda & minutes automation |
| Enterprise Risk Management | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Risk tracking, Compliance workflows, Board-level risk reporting |
| Audit Management | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Audit planning, Issue remediation tracking, Integrated reporting |
| Market Intelligence | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Peer benchmarking, Executive compensation insights, Shareholder sentiment analysis |
Price details: https://www.diligent.com/pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| BoardEffect | Diligent offers stronger AI-driven automation and governance intelligence, reducing manual board prep more effectively. Its security controls and compliance tooling are more robust for regulated enterprises, while the interface scales better for large, global boards with complex committee structures. |
| OnBoard | Compared to OnBoard, Diligent provides deeper governance, risk, and compliance capabilities alongside board management. The AI summaries, risk scanning, and integrated market intelligence make it better suited for organizations that need advanced oversight rather than lightweight meeting tools. |
| BoardDocs | Diligent surpasses BoardDocs with enterprise-grade security, AI-powered workflows, and broader governance coverage. It is more flexible for private and public companies, offering end-to-end board lifecycle management rather than primarily document publishing. |
| Nasdaq Boardvantage | Diligent is generally easier for directors to adopt, with more automation in board books and minutes. Its AI features and integrated GRC ecosystem provide more operational value beyond meetings, especially for compliance-focused organizations. |
| iBabs | While iBabs is strong in usability, Diligent offers superior analytics, AI insights, and scalability. Large enterprises benefit from Diligent’s broader integrations, reporting depth, and long-term ROI for complex governance environments. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| BoardEffect | Diligent is typically more expensive and may feel excessive for smaller nonprofits that BoardEffect serves well. The advanced AI and compliance features can add complexity for teams that only need basic agenda and document sharing. |
| OnBoard | OnBoard can be faster to deploy and simpler for small teams. Diligent’s enterprise focus means longer sales cycles and setup time, which may be a drawback for organizations seeking quick implementation. |
| BoardDocs | Organizations used to BoardDocs’ simpler publishing model may find Diligent’s workflows more rigid at first. The learning curve can be steeper for administrative users transitioning from basic document portals. |
| Nasdaq Boardvantage | Diligent lacks some native capital markets integrations that Nasdaq emphasizes. Companies deeply tied to Nasdaq’s ecosystem may find Boardvantage more aligned with their existing financial workflows. |
| iBabs | Diligent’s pricing and feature depth can be overkill for smaller European organizations where iBabs offers a more cost-effective, lightweight experience focused purely on meetings. |
Reviews
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Diligent Board Management Software delivers strong security and centralized workflows that help teams compile and distribute board packs with ease. Implementation moves “from months to days,” and the intuitive interface makes board meetings and document management simple to navigate. Some users report occasional password access issues after periods of non-use and note limited functionality in certain areas.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.7/5): Diligent Board Management Software earns praise for creating and sharing content with the Board of Directors, and one snippet highlights that board members feel happy with the product overall.
- Reddit r/ExecutiveAssistants: One executive assistant described Diligent as “okay” but less flexible on the backend than Boardvantage and “twice the price.” For complex agenda packages running to three hundred pages, Boardvantage worked much better for building and editing.
- Gartner Review (Rating: 4.3/5): A reviewer calls it a “Great solution for Audit Management!” and highlights comprehensive functionalities, robust design, an easy-to-use interface, and helpful training provided by the product team.
- infotech.com Review: One end user recommends linking Diligent Boards with Okta for added security and “peace of mind,” gives a 9/10 likelihood to recommend score, and reports reliable performance with continual product improvements. No notable dislikes appear in the shared feedback.
- smartsuite.com Review: Enterprise users value the module-based structure with components like “Projects, Compliance Maps, Frameworks, Asset/Risk Manager,” which provides clear segregation for risk and compliance work. Smaller organizations struggle with high pricing, 20%+ auto-renewal increases if contracts go unnegotiated, a steep learning curve, long onboarding, and an outdated user interface.
