Home » CMMS Software » Work Order Software » Glideapps Work Order Management Software
Glideapps Work Order Management Software enables teams to create fully customized work order systems without coding. It connects office and field teams through mobile and web apps, offering real-time job tracking, workflows, integrations, and analytics.
Built on Glide’s no-code platform, it adapts to businesses of all sizes, from simple internal tools to enterprise-grade operational systems.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Free) | Unlimited drafts, 1 editor, Community support |
| Explorer | $0 (Free) $25/mo (Billed Monthly) / $19/mo (Billed Annually) | Core Glide features, Limited updates, Personal users |
| Maker | Starting at $60/mo (Billed Monthly) / $49/mo (Billed Annually) | Unlimited personal users, 3 published apps, Glide AI & workflows |
| Business | $199/mo (Billed Annually) / $249/mo (Billed Monthly) | 30 users included, Unlimited apps, API & integrations |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | SSO, Dedicated account manager, Enterprise integrations |
Price details: https://www.glideapps.com/pricing
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | Compared to MaintainX, Glide offers significantly more flexibility through full app customization and no-code logic. Businesses are not locked into predefined maintenance workflows and can adapt tools as processes evolve. Glide’s pricing also becomes more cost-effective for teams needing multiple internal tools beyond maintenance. |
| UpKeep | Glide is easier to adapt than UpKeep for non-traditional workflows, since users can design interfaces and data models from scratch. It works well for teams that want a single platform for work orders, CRM, and internal operations rather than a maintenance-only solution. |
| Fiix | Fiix focuses heavily on asset maintenance, while Glide excels at broader operational use cases. Glide’s no-code builder allows faster deployment, simpler training, and lower setup costs for teams that don’t need deep CMMS-specific functionality. |
| ServiceNow | Against ServiceNow, Glide is far more approachable for small and mid-sized businesses. It avoids long implementation cycles and high consulting fees, enabling teams to launch functional work order systems in days instead of months. |
| Jobber | Unlike Jobber’s fixed feature set, Glide allows companies to build highly tailored internal tools. This makes Glide better suited for unique operational workflows that don’t fit standard field service templates. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | MaintainX offers deeper out-of-the-box maintenance features like preventive maintenance templates and asset hierarchies. Glide requires more manual configuration to reach the same depth, which can increase setup time for maintenance-heavy teams. |
| UpKeep | UpKeep provides a more guided CMMS experience with predefined reports and workflows. Glide’s flexibility can feel overwhelming for users who want a ready-made system without designing data structures themselves. |
| Fiix | Fiix includes advanced asset analytics and compliance features that Glide does not natively provide. Organizations with strict regulatory or asset-tracking requirements may find Glide too general-purpose. |
| ServiceNow | ServiceNow scales better for very large enterprises with complex ITSM and EAM needs. Glide lacks some advanced governance, audit, and cross-department automation features found in enterprise service platforms. |
| Jobber | Jobber includes built-in customer billing, scheduling, and invoicing optimized for field service businesses. Glide can replicate these, but only with additional configuration and integrations. |
