Gofmx Parts & Maintenance Inventory Management Software Favicon

Gofmx FMX’s Work Order Software

User-friendly work order software for facilities and maintenance teams

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Gofmx FMX’s Work Order Software Overview

  • Updated February 27, 2026

FMX’s Work Order Software is a cloud-based CMMS designed to help organizations submit, track, and resolve maintenance requests efficiently. It centralizes work orders, improves communication, and tracks labor hours, costs, and equipment performance.

Built with simplicity in mind, FMX is widely used across K-12 schools, higher education, government, healthcare, and property management organizations seeking better accountability and preventive maintenance workflows.

Key Features

  • Centralized Work Orders: Submit, assign, track, and close work orders from one shared platform.
  • Preventive Maintenance: Schedule recurring maintenance tasks to reduce downtime and extend asset life.
  • Labor & Cost Tracking: Monitor labor hours, inventory usage, and total maintenance costs per request.
  • Asset & Equipment Management: Maintain detailed records for equipment, locations, and maintenance history.
  • Mobile-Friendly Access: Allow technicians and staff to manage requests from any device.
  • Reporting & Dashboards: Gain insight into performance, response times, and maintenance trends.

Price

Plan Price Featured
Custom Quote Price varies by number of users, features, and workflows (Annual Contract) Unlimited requesters, Pricing based on managing users, K-12 special enrollment-based pricing

Price details: https://www.gofmx.com/pricing/quote/

Pros

Competitor

Pros
UpKeep Compared to UpKeep, FMX is often easier for non-technical staff to learn and use. Its interface focuses on simplicity over advanced configuration, making it especially attractive for schools and small teams. FMX can also be more cost-effective for organizations that need unlimited requesters without paying per seat.
Fiix FMX offers a more guided onboarding experience than Fiix, with hands-on implementation and account management. Many users find FMX less overwhelming in daily use, particularly for work order tracking and scheduling, while still covering essential CMMS functionality at a competitive overall cost.
Hippo CMMS Against Hippo CMMS, FMX stands out for its intuitive request submission and communication tools. FMX is frequently preferred by education and government users due to its K-12-focused pricing model and ability to support unlimited requesters without additional licensing complexity.
Maintenance Connection FMX is generally faster to deploy and simpler to maintain than Maintenance Connection. Organizations that do not require highly complex enterprise asset management features often choose FMX for its lower administrative overhead, clearer workflows, and easier day-to-day work order management.
ServiceChannel Compared to ServiceChannel, FMX provides stronger internal maintenance team tools rather than vendor-heavy workflows. FMX is typically more affordable for schools and nonprofits and gives internal staff better visibility into labor, costs, and preventive maintenance without relying on external service networks.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
UpKeep When compared to UpKeep, FMX offers fewer advanced mobile-first and offline capabilities. UpKeep may be a better fit for organizations with highly mobile field technicians who rely heavily on complex mobile workflows and real-time data syncing in low-connectivity environments.
Fiix FMX lacks some of the deeper automation, API flexibility, and advanced analytics available in Fiix. Organizations with strong technical teams or complex integration requirements may find Fiix more suitable for large-scale industrial maintenance operations.
Hippo CMMS Compared to Hippo CMMS, FMX has less publicly transparent pricing, requiring a sales conversation. Smaller businesses looking for instant self-serve sign-up and visible monthly pricing may find Hippo more convenient during early evaluation stages.
Maintenance Connection FMX does not match the depth of enterprise asset management and compliance features offered by Maintenance Connection. Large enterprises with strict regulatory reporting, advanced asset hierarchies, or heavy customization needs may outgrow FMX.
ServiceChannel FMX is less focused on multi-location vendor management than ServiceChannel. Retail and franchise organizations that prioritize contractor sourcing, invoicing automation, and national vendor networks may find ServiceChannel better aligned with their operational model.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • Capterra Review (Rating: 4.7/5): Gofmx FMX’s Work Order Software earns praise for its customizable work order creation and convenient mobile access, and many reviewers highlight the intuitive interface as easy to navigate. Some note that reporting limitations restrict deeper data analysis.
  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.7/5): Gofmx FMX’s Work Order Software helps multi-site teams view all campus calendars in one place and use search and copy features with ease, and one user values the ability to build lead/lag setup and tear-down time into events without confusion. Another reviewer praises a responsive implementation specialist as the best vendor partner they have worked with, while others mention that editing a single occurrence in a recurring schedule and configuring user permissions and notifications can feel cumbersome.