- Meeting Transcription: Transcribes online and in-person meetings in more than 100 languages.
- AI Summaries and Tasks: Produces meeting reports, follow-up tasks, custom summaries, and AI answers.
- Meeting Access: Works with Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and the Leexi mobile app.
- Integrations: Supports CRM and ATS synchronization plus API and webhooks.
- Security and Compliance: GDPR compliant and ISO 27001 certified, with data stored and processed in France.
Leexi AI
European AI meeting notetaker for secure transcription and summaries
Updated July 30, 2026
Leexi AI Overview
Leexi AI is a GDPR-compliant AI notetaker built in Europe that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings automatically. It works with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and in-person meetings via mobile app.
Designed for teams, recruiters, and sales, Leexi emphasizes data security, ISO 27001 compliance, and productivity through AI-generated insights and reports.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Current price | Key inclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $12/user/month, invoiced annually, excluding VAT | 100+ transcription languages, mobile app, six-month storage and up to 20 meeting hours/month |
| AI-Meeting | $23/user/month, invoiced annually, excluding VAT | AI summaries and tasks, meeting Q&A, custom summaries and vocabulary |
| Business | $39/user/month, invoiced annually, excluding VAT | CRM and ATS sync, API and webhooks, trends and team workflows |
| Enterprise | Request pricing | Enterprise controls, security, analytics and deployment support |
Pricing source: https://www.leexi.ai/en/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Otter.ai | Compared to Otter.ai, Leexi offers stronger GDPR compliance and European data hosting, which appeals to EU-based organizations. Its in-person meeting recording and offline mobile app are more flexible, while pricing is competitive for teams needing secure transcription without relying on US-hosted infrastructure. |
| Fireflies.ai | Leexi is easier to adopt for non-technical teams than Fireflies.ai, with simpler pricing and clearer feature tiers. It focuses more on structured summaries and compliance, making it attractive for regulated industries where Fireflies’ broader automation may feel excessive. |
| Fathom | While Fathom emphasizes free personal use, Leexi provides deeper team features such as CRM auto-completion and analytics. Its ISO certification and enterprise controls make it better suited for growing organizations needing governance beyond basic meeting summaries. |
| Gong | Against Gong, Leexi is significantly more affordable and faster to deploy. It suits small to mid-sized teams that want AI meeting insights without the heavy sales-only focus, long onboarding, and high enterprise costs associated with Gong. |
| Avoma | Leexi is more straightforward than Avoma, prioritizing transcription and summaries over complex meeting intelligence layers. This makes it easier to use daily, with less setup, while still covering core needs for sales, recruiters, and managers. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Otter.ai | Compared to Otter.ai, Leexi has a smaller ecosystem of third-party integrations and fewer real-time collaboration features. Teams that rely heavily on live note editing or broad app marketplaces may find Otter more flexible. |
| Fireflies.ai | Fireflies.ai offers deeper workflow automation and searchable conversation intelligence. Leexi can feel more limited for advanced automation use cases, especially for teams wanting extensive rule-based triggers across many tools. |
| Fathom | Fathom’s generous free tier and instant summaries appeal to individuals, whereas Leexi quickly requires a paid plan for meaningful usage. Solo users may see Leexi as less cost-effective if they do not need compliance features. |
| Gong | Gong delivers far more advanced revenue intelligence and coaching analytics. Leexi lacks deep sales performance dashboards, making it less suitable for large sales organizations that depend on granular deal and rep analysis. |
| Avoma | Avoma provides richer agenda management and meeting lifecycle tools. Leexi focuses mainly on post-meeting outputs, so teams wanting end-to-end meeting planning and analytics may find Avoma more comprehensive. |
Reviews
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.9/5 from 35 reviews): The current review pool frequently praises intuitive use and the range and quality of meeting outputs. Critical comments focus mainly on pricing and limitations in search or retrieval.
