- Meeting agenda builder: Prepare structured agendas, meeting books and collaboration spaces in Teams and Microsoft 365.
- Minutes and action tracking: Create one-click minutes, assign actions and carry decisions into follow-up work.
- Decisions AI: Use included monthly AI credits for agendas and meeting recaps, or add Premium AI for unrestricted credits.
- Meeting Engagement Score: Monitor participation and engagement across supported meetings.
- Microsoft tenant integration: Work with Teams permissions, meeting transcripts and Microsoft 365 administration controls.
MeetingDecisions.com
Enterprise-grade meeting management for Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365
Updated August 11, 2026
MeetingDecisions.com Overview
Decisions is a meeting management app built for Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365. Organizers can prepare agendas and meeting books, share materials, record minutes and decisions, and follow actions after the call.
AI recaps and engagement scores add context to the meeting record. The decision log keeps formal outcomes tied to the discussion instead of leaving them in separate notes.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (up to 5 users) | Limited access to the meeting-management and productivity suite; limited Decisions AI access |
| Business | $14/user/month (billed annually) | Core meeting-management tools and 100 Decisions AI credits per paid license each month |
| Large teams | Custom quote (50+ users) | Core tools plus premium options such as secure voting and eSignature |
| Premium AI license | $10/user/month (billed annually) | Add-on with no AI credit restrictions; requires a Decisions license and has no purchase minimum |
The Free plan supports up to five users. Business starts at $14 per user each month on annual billing; the $10 Premium AI license is an add-on rather than the base meeting-management plan.
Pricing source: Decisions meeting pricing
Pros
| Compared with | Why this product may fit better |
|---|---|
| Fellow | Fellow works as a separate meeting workspace, while Decisions keeps agendas, minutes and follow-up inside Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365. Adoption can be easier when participants do not need another identity or place to check. |
| Microsoft Loop | Formal agendas, meeting books, voting, minutes and engagement scoring give Decisions a clearer governance trail after a call. Microsoft Loop provides more flexible collaborative pages, but it does not impose the same structured meeting record. |
| Otter.ai | Otter.ai centers transcription and AI notes, whereas Decisions puts preparation and follow-up beside its recaps. Managers can connect what was said with a named action owner instead of stopping at the transcript. |
| Asana | Asana manages work after a meeting, while Decisions captures the meeting context before handing actions to Microsoft Planner or another task system. Teams preserve why a task exists without turning Decisions into a project portfolio tool. |
Cons
| Compared with | Where this product may fall short |
|---|---|
| Fellow | Fellow is more platform-neutral, while Decisions' strongest workflows and permissions assume Microsoft 365. Google Workspace or mixed-tool organizations may find Fellow easier to deploy across employees and external participants. |
| Otter.ai | Teams that mainly need cross-platform transcription may find the Decisions package excessive. Otter.ai is simpler for that job, while Decisions adds tenant permissions, meeting governance and per-user licensing that transcript-focused buyers may rarely use. |
| Asana | Asana provides roadmaps, dependencies and portfolio reporting that sit outside Decisions' meeting-centered scope. Organizations should keep Asana or another project system for execution instead of expecting Decisions to manage every meeting-created task. |
Reviews
- Capterra reviews: Capterra lists 4.5/5. Reviewers like structured agendas, recap creation and action assignment inside Microsoft workflows, while advanced features take time to learn; a pilot should therefore include ordinary meeting owners, not only the administrators who configure the tenant.
- G2 reviews: G2 lists 4.4/5 and emphasizes more disciplined meetings and follow-through. Comments about AI nuance and integrations suggest checking how well recaps handle the team's language and where assigned actions must go after the meeting.
- Microsoft Marketplace reviews: Microsoft Marketplace lists 4.2/5 and adds useful deployment context: customers appreciate the Microsoft integration, but tenant permissions can complicate setup. IT involvement should be part of the evaluation whenever external participants, recording or restricted data are involved.
