| Otter.ai |
Wave offers a simpler, mobile-first experience with one-tap recording, making it easier for casual and on-the-go users. Its interface is more intuitive for non-enterprise users, and background recording on phones provides flexibility that Otter’s meeting-centric workflow often lacks. |
| Fireflies.ai |
Compared to Fireflies, Wave is more affordable for individual users and focuses less on complex team analytics. It excels in personal note-taking, phone calls, and everyday conversations, whereas Fireflies is more sales and CRM-oriented. |
| Notta |
Wave emphasizes automatic summaries and conversational AI chat over raw transcription. Its clean UX and strong mobile apps make it easier to adopt quickly, especially for users who want insights rather than long transcripts. |
| Avoma |
Wave is significantly cheaper and easier to use than Avoma, which targets revenue teams. For individuals and small teams, Wave provides essential transcription and summarization without overwhelming setup or enterprise-focused features. |
| tl;dv |
Wave supports a wider range of everyday use cases, including phone calls and offline conversations. Its background recording and mobile-first design give it an advantage over tl;dv’s primarily meeting-video-based approach. |