- AI Meeting Notes: Automatically records, transcribes, and generates structured summaries after every meeting.
- Multi-Meeting Insights: Analyzes multiple calls to surface trends, objections, and recurring topics.
- CRM & Tool Integrations: Syncs notes, action items, and outcomes directly to CRMs and 5,000+ tools.
- Sales Coaching: Uses AI to evaluate calls, track playbook adherence, and accelerate rep onboarding.
- Multilingual Support: Transcribes and translates meetings in over 30 languages with high accuracy.
- Enterprise-Grade Security: End-to-end encryption, GDPR and SOC 2 compliance, and EU-hosted data options.
tl;dv
AI meeting notetaker turning conversations into actionable company-wide insights
Updated April 8, 2026
tl;dv Overview
tl;dv is an AI-powered meeting notetaker designed for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. It automatically records, transcribes, summarizes, and analyzes meetings, helping teams eliminate manual note-taking. Beyond summaries, tl;dv delivers aggregated insights, CRM updates, multilingual transcription, and sales coaching features, enabling sales, product, and customer success teams to make smarter, faster decisions from every conversation.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Unlimited meeting recordings, AI-generated notes, Multi-meeting summaries |
| Pro | $29/mo (Billed Monthly)/$18/mo (Billed Yearly) | Advanced AI summaries, CRM integrations, 30+ language transcription |
| Business | $39/mo (Billed Monthly)$29/mo (Billed Yearly) | Sales coaching analytics, AI reports across meetings, Team management controls |
| Enterprise | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | SOC 2 & GDPR compliance, Private AI hosting, Dedicated support & onboarding |
Price details: https://tldv.io/app/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Gong | Compared to Gong, tl;dv is significantly more affordable and accessible for small and mid-sized teams. It avoids large upfront platform fees while still offering AI summaries, insights, and sales coaching, making it easier to adopt without long procurement cycles or heavy onboarding requirements. |
| Fireflies.ai | tl;dv provides deeper multi-meeting analysis and sales-focused insights than Fireflies.ai. While both tools transcribe meetings, tl;dv places stronger emphasis on aggregated intelligence, coaching, and CRM automation, reducing the need for managers to manually review individual calls. |
| Otter.ai | Unlike Otter.ai, which focuses primarily on transcription, tl;dv extends into actionable business insights and follow-ups. Teams benefit from AI-driven summaries, automated CRM updates, and reporting that better support revenue, product, and customer success workflows. |
| Avoma | tl;dv is generally easier to use and quicker to deploy than Avoma, especially for teams wanting instant value. Its free plan and simple setup lower the barrier to entry, while still delivering strong AI summaries and insights without extensive configuration. |
| Fathom | Compared to Fathom, tl;dv excels in company-wide intelligence and multi-call reporting. While Fathom works well for individual meetings, tl;dv better supports scaling insights across teams, making it more suitable for managers and growing organizations. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Gong | Compared to Gong, tl;dv lacks some of the deepest enterprise revenue intelligence features, such as advanced forecasting and highly granular deal analytics. Large enterprises with complex sales operations may still find Gong more comprehensive despite its higher cost. |
| Fireflies.ai | Fireflies.ai offers broader native integrations and automation rules in some workflows. tl;dv users may rely more on external tools or custom setups when trying to replicate highly specific automation scenarios available in Fireflies. |
| Otter.ai | Otter.ai can feel more lightweight and polished for pure transcription use cases. Users who only want live captions and simple transcripts may find tl;dv’s broader feature set unnecessary or more complex than needed. |
| Avoma | Avoma provides more structured meeting templates and agenda management. tl;dv focuses more on post-meeting insights, which may be a drawback for teams that want heavy pre-meeting planning and facilitation features built in. |
| Fathom | Fathom emphasizes a bot-free experience and simplicity. tl;dv’s richer analytics and AI reporting can feel heavier for solo users who only need quick summaries without ongoing analysis or team-level reporting. |
Reviews
- Trustpilot Review (Rating: 2.7/5): Several reviewers criticize Tldv.io for pushing a “free 7-days trial” of the business plan instead of honoring a truly free subscription, calling it a waste of time. Complaints also mention “invasive permissions,” buggy performance, poor note quality, and notes that fail to load with messages like “our team is working hard to resolve technical problems.” One user reports that it activates on calls that are not theirs and proves really hard to remove.
- Product Hunt Review (Rating: 4.1/5): A paid subscriber describes Tldv.io as extremely handy for recapping meetings in a quick, concise manner and highlights the transcription feature as a favorite. The ability to send recordings easily adds to its value for sharing takeaways.
- efficient.app Review: The floating pop-up inside meetings lets teams type notes directly during the call, and Tldv.io automatically timestamps each message so everyone can see updates in real time. The review praises how notes and timestamps connect to the recording and flow to the team, plus calls out the “nifty Slack integration.” It also notes a desire for more native CRM integrations, although the team plans to open the API.
