Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Online Fax Software » Fax.Live
Fax.Live is a cloud-based online fax service designed to make faxing as simple as email. It allows users to send and receive faxes from any browser or device without a fax machine or landline.
With digital PDF storage, personal fax numbers, email notifications, and secure transmission, Fax.Live suits both occasional users and businesses needing reliable internet faxing.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | $0 (Limited Trial) | Send faxes online, Receive faxes, Basic feature access |
| Monthly Plans | Price not publicly listed (Billed Monthly) | Send & receive faxes, Unlimited cloud storage, Personal fax number |
| Annual Plans | Price not publicly listed (Billed Annually) | Lower effective monthly cost, All features included, Email notifications |
Price details: https://fax.live/send/
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| eFax | Fax.Live is typically easier to use than eFax, with a simpler dashboard and fewer setup steps. Users who only need straightforward faxing often prefer Fax.Live’s cleaner interface and lack of complex add-ons, making it more approachable for non-technical users. |
| Fax.Plus | Compared to Fax.Plus, Fax.Live focuses on simplicity rather than feature depth. This makes it faster to get started, especially for users who only need to send and receive faxes without managing teams, APIs, or advanced compliance settings. |
| MyFax | Fax.Live offers a more modern web-based experience than MyFax, which some users find dated. The ability to fax directly from a browser without extra software makes Fax.Live more convenient for casual and remote users. |
| Dropbox Fax | Unlike Dropbox Fax, Fax.Live does not require integration with a broader file ecosystem. This can be an advantage for users who want a dedicated fax tool without depending on Dropbox accounts or storage limitations. |
| HelloFax | Fax.Live provides more complete send-and-receive functionality in its paid plans compared to HelloFax’s limited free usage. Users who fax regularly may find Fax.Live more practical once they move beyond occasional one-page sends. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| eFax | Compared to eFax, Fax.Live lacks clearly published pricing and enterprise-grade compliance details. Businesses that require transparent plan limits, HIPAA documentation, or long-established brand trust may find eFax more suitable. |
| Fax.Plus | Fax.Plus offers more advanced features such as APIs, team management, and integrations. Fax.Live may feel limited for organizations that need automation, developer tools, or scalable multi-user administration. |
| MyFax | MyFax provides clearer plan structures and long-term market presence. Fax.Live’s less transparent pricing and smaller footprint may cause hesitation for users who want predictable billing and extensive third-party reviews. |
| Dropbox Fax | Dropbox Fax benefits from strong document collaboration and signing features. Fax.Live does not offer native e-signatures or deep document workflows, which can be a drawback for business-heavy document processes. |
| HelloFax | HelloFax integrates tightly with Google Workspace for document sending. Fax.Live lacks similar native cloud app integrations, which may slow workflows for users heavily invested in Google Docs or Drive. |
