- Real-Time AI Answers: Responds instantly to live questions using meeting audio, transcripts, and on-screen context.
- Undetectable Operation: Runs invisibly without joining calls or appearing in participant lists or screen shares.
- AI Meeting Notes: Generates clean, shareable summaries immediately after meetings end.
- Instant Follow-Up Emails: Creates ready-to-send follow-up messages within seconds after a call.
- Multi-Language Transcription: Supports 12+ languages with fast response times and high accuracy.
Cluely
Undetectable AI assistant for real-time meeting notes and live answers
Updated February 27, 2026
Cluely Overview
Cluely is a live AI meeting assistant that listens to conversations and reads on-screen context to provide real-time answers, prompts, and follow-ups during meetings. Unlike traditional AI notetakers, it remains completely invisible to other participants.
Cluely also generates polished meeting notes and instant follow‑up emails, supporting multiple languages with fast, highly accurate transcription.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0 (Free) | Limited AI responses, Limited meeting notetaking, Custom instructions with up to 3 files |
| Pro | $20/mo (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited AI responses, Unlimited meeting notetaking, Access to latest AI models |
| Pro + Undetectability | $75/mo (Billed Monthly) | Completely hidden during screen sharing, Unlimited AI usage, Priority support |
Price details: https://cluely.com/pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Otter.ai | Compared to Otter.ai, Cluely works during the meeting rather than only after, giving users real-time prompts and answers. It is also invisible to other participants, while Otter joins calls as a visible bot, which can disrupt sensitive interviews or sales conversations. |
| Fireflies.ai | Cluely offers faster, live assistance instead of post-call summaries only. Its undetectable design avoids compliance or perception issues that arise when Fireflies visibly records meetings, making Cluely easier to use in high-stakes or confidential discussions. |
| tl;dv | Unlike tl;dv, which focuses on recording and summarizing, Cluely actively supports users during conversations. This makes it more helpful for interviews and sales calls where immediate guidance and suggested responses are more valuable than recordings. |
| Fathom | Fathom emphasizes automated notes after Zoom calls, while Cluely assists in real time across apps. Cluely’s broader app support and live AI responses provide more flexibility for users who need help beyond simple note capture. |
| Notion AI | Compared to Notion AI’s document-focused assistance, Cluely is purpose-built for live meetings. It requires less manual setup and delivers immediate conversational support, rather than relying on users to prompt AI after meetings are finished. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Otter.ai | Otter.ai offers stronger team collaboration features and mature enterprise controls. Compared to Otter, Cluely is more individual-focused and may feel limited for large teams that need shared workspaces, advanced exports, and administrative oversight. |
| Fireflies.ai | Fireflies provides deeper CRM and workflow integrations. Cluely, while powerful in-call, currently offers fewer native integrations, which can make it less convenient for teams that rely heavily on automated syncing with sales and support tools. |
| tl;dv | tl;dv is more transparent and compliance-friendly for organizations. Cluely’s undetectable nature raises ethical and policy concerns for some users, making it less suitable in regulated environments where explicit consent is required. |
| Fathom | Fathom offers a generous free tier for structured summaries. Cluely’s free plan is more limited, and users may feel pressured to upgrade sooner to unlock meaningful usage, especially for frequent meetings. |
| Notion AI | Notion AI excels at long-term knowledge management. Cluely lacks a robust internal knowledge base, so users seeking to store, organize, and reuse insights across projects may find it less comprehensive. |
Reviews
- Reddit r/Cluely: One user felt impressed with how fast Cluely transcribed microphone and speaker audio, though it still lagged behind true real-time answers. They wanted Leetcode solutions to include deeper context and clearer explanations instead of relying on the app to wait for prompts like “please explain the solution.” At $20 for a month plan, the overall value felt decent despite those gaps.
- medium.com Review: The writer tested the free Windows version and liked how the app stayed completely invisible during screen shares and never popped up uninvited. Real-time prompts sometimes nailed small but critical details, such as recalling a forgotten partner company name and drafting a clear client follow-up in seconds. Speed issues and occasional slow responses reduced the “secret copilot” magic during live calls.
- bitdegree.org Review: The reviewer acknowledged that the Pro plan at $20/month delivers unlimited access to advanced models and feeds AI-generated answers during interviews, sales calls, and exams. At the same time, strong ethical concerns surfaced around “cheat on everything” positioning, with worries about eroding trust, harming genuine skill development, and creating privacy and regulatory risks.
- Trustpilot Review (Rating: 2.4/5): Multiple reviewers struggled with setup and basic functionality, including one who spent 45 minutes trying to configure features that the menus did not even offer. Others reported being unable to delete the app from an Apple computer or click the “delete account” button, and several called the refund process a “scam.” A few brief comments labeled Cluely a “great assistive technology,” but frustration around cancellations, broken invoice emails, and language limitations like lack of Polish support dominated the feedback.
- fritz.ai Review: After using Cluely across 20+ Zoom and Google Meet calls, the reviewer praised its clear, well-structured summaries and automatic task extraction that worked “out of the box.” Setup took under five minutes with Google Calendar and Zoom, and meeting summaries plus action lists arrived within 10 minutes. Limitations included English-only support, no built-in transcript editing, and a lack of advanced team analytics.
