Fax.Plus

Secure online fax service for individuals, teams, and regulated enterprises

Updated February 27, 2026

Fax.Plus Overview

Fax.Plus is a cloud-based online fax service that enables users to send and receive faxes securely from web, mobile, email, and integrated business tools. Designed for individuals, SMBs, and enterprises, it emphasizes compliance, encryption, and reliability.

With global coverage, flexible fax numbers, APIs, and integrations, Fax.Plus modernizes faxing without traditional hardware.

Key Features

  • Online Faxing: Send and receive faxes securely from web, mobile, or desktop apps.
  • Email to Fax: Fax documents directly from your email inbox.
  • Fax Number Flexibility: Get local, toll-free, or international fax numbers, or port existing ones.
  • Mobile Apps: Full-featured Android and iOS apps for faxing on the go.
  • Security & Compliance: End-to-end encryption with HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR support.
  • Integrations & API: Google Workspace, Microsoft, Slack, Zapier, and programmable Fax API.

Pricing

Plan Price Featured
Free $0 (Free) 10 total fax pages, Send-only faxing, Basic web access
Basic $8.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $6.99/mo (Billed Annually – $83.99/year) 200 pages/month, One fax number, Email-to-fax & mobile apps
Premium $17.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $13.99/mo (Billed Annually – $167.99/year) 500 pages/month, Toll-free numbers, Fax number porting
Business $34.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $27.99/mo (Billed Annually – $335.99/year) 1,000 pages/month, Team setup (5 users), Admin console & Slack integration
Enterprise $99.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $79.99/mo (Billed Annually – $959.99/year) 4,000 pages/month, Unlimited users, HIPAA compliance & API access

Price details: https://www.fax.plus/pricing

Pros

Competitor

Pros

eFax Compared to eFax, Fax.Plus is more affordable at entry and mid-tier levels, while offering similar core faxing features. Its interface is cleaner and easier to navigate for new users, and mobile apps are generally faster and more reliable. Fax.Plus also provides clearer compliance options without requiring enterprise-only contracts.
MyFax Fax.Plus offers stronger security controls and broader compliance certifications than MyFax. The platform is more modern, supports deeper integrations like Slack and Zapier, and includes an API even on higher-tier plans. Pricing scales more predictably, making it easier for growing teams to manage costs.
RingCentral Fax Unlike RingCentral Fax, Fax.Plus is focused purely on faxing, which simplifies setup and daily use. It is typically cheaper for users who do not need full UCaaS features. Fax.Plus also provides more transparent page limits and better international fax flexibility.
SRFax Fax.Plus delivers a more user-friendly experience than SRFax, especially on mobile devices. It includes polished apps, easier onboarding, and clearer pricing tiers. While both support HIPAA, Fax.Plus adds modern integrations and a developer-friendly API that SRFax lacks.
MetroFax Compared to MetroFax, Fax.Plus provides better collaboration features for teams and enterprises. It supports multiple users, admin controls, and analytics on higher plans. The platform also benefits from stronger global coverage and more frequent feature updates.

Cons

Competitor

Cons

eFax Compared to eFax, Fax.Plus includes fewer bundled extras such as large document storage quotas on lower plans. Some advanced options, like very high outbound concurrency, require upgrading to Enterprise. Users accustomed to eFax’s long-standing brand presence may find Fax.Plus less recognized.
MyFax MyFax offers simpler flat-rate plans, while Fax.Plus relies heavily on page-based limits that can confuse high-volume users. Exceeding monthly page allowances can increase costs. MyFax may feel more straightforward for users who fax infrequently and want minimal configuration.
RingCentral Fax RingCentral Fax benefits from being part of a full communications suite, which Fax.Plus does not provide. Businesses seeking unified voice, messaging, and fax in one contract may find Fax.Plus less suitable, as it requires separate tools for calling and messaging.
SRFax SRFax emphasizes healthcare use cases, and some medical organizations may prefer its narrower focus. Fax.Plus, while compliant, can feel more general-purpose. Certain healthcare-specific workflows may require additional configuration or higher-tier plans.
MetroFax MetroFax includes unlimited faxing on some plans, whereas Fax.Plus enforces page caps across all tiers. For users sending very large volumes consistently, MetroFax may be more cost-effective despite having fewer collaboration and integration features.

Reviews

  • Trustpilot Review (Rating: 3.9/5): Fax.Plus earns praise for quick, helpful customer service, with one user noting a representative “kept on it until we got it resolved.” Customers highlight how easily they can fax from a phone, iPad, or computer, and one person relied on it in an emergency to send a medical report for immediate confirmation. Several reviewers call it affordable and reliable, and one appreciated the reminder and grace period to update payment details after a credit card change.
  • 💬apple.com Review: Fax.Plus impressed one reviewer who needed to fax documents to the U.S. government, allowing them to scan papers, upload files, or snap photos and receive confirmation by email. The low cost stood out, with the reviewer comparing “penny per page” pricing to paying three dollars per page at UPS or USPS. The ability to get clear proof that a fax went through successfully brought peace of mind during a stressful process.
  • 💬google.com Review: The Android app highlights convenience such as sending faxes without a fax machine, scanning documents with automatic border cropping and perspective correction, and storing files in a fully encrypted archive. Access to features like electronic signatures and push notifications for incoming faxes adds flexibility for handling paperwork on the go. Support for Google Drive and Dropbox imports gives users multiple ways to attach and send documents directly from a phone.