Lattice

Manage employee performance, engagement, goals, and professional development effectively.

Updated July 30, 2026

Lattice Overview

Lattice is a people-management platform centered on performance reviews, goals and OKRs, engagement surveys, continuous feedback, one-on-ones, career growth and compensation cycles. It is designed to help managers and HR teams run repeatable talent programs and connect employee development with company priorities.

Lattice’s current lineup is modular. The page should not be read as a general-purpose core HRIS, payroll or time-tracking listing.

Key Features

  • Performance reviews: Structured review cycles, 360-degree feedback, calibration and performance improvement workflows.
  • Goals and OKRs: Individual, team and company goals with alignment and progress tracking.
  • Continuous feedback and one-on-ones: Tools for praise, feedback, agendas and recurring manager conversations.
  • Engagement surveys: Pulse, engagement and lifecycle surveys with analysis and follow-up planning.
  • Career growth: Competency frameworks, career tracks and individual development planning.
  • Compensation cycles: Compensation review, budgeting and approval workflows in the paid add-on.
  • Analytics and AI assistance: Reporting and assisted summaries or insights across supported talent workflows.
  • Integrations: Connections with HR systems and workplace tools to keep people data and workflows aligned.

Pricing

Plan / module Current price Scope
Foundations $13 per seat/month Core people-management foundation.
Performance $10 per seat/month Performance review and feedback workflows.
Goals & OKRs $8 per seat/month Goal setting, alignment and progress tracking.
Engagement $4 per seat/month Employee engagement surveys and insights.
Grow +$4 per seat/month Career development and growth tools.
Compensation +$6 per seat/month Compensation planning workflows.
Enterprise Contact sales Tailored enterprise package and support.

Contracts are annual, prices are in USD, and the minimum annual agreement is $4,000. Add-on modules are not standalone entry prices.

Pricing source: https://lattice.com/pricing

Pros

Competitor Where Lattice can stand out
Leapsome A focused combination of reviews, goals, engagement and career growth in a unified manager workflow.
15Five Structured review, calibration and compensation workflows for organizations running formal talent programs.
Culture Amp Broader performance, goals and career-development modules alongside engagement surveys.
HiBob Deeper specialization in performance management and employee development rather than core HR record keeping.
PerformYard A wider mix of goals, engagement, growth and compensation modules around performance reviews.

Cons

Competitor Cons of Lattice
Leapsome Lattice lacks as deep AI‑driven feedback and learning features as Leapsome offers which may limit personalized growth support.
15Five Lattice takes longer to set up and has fewer seamless integrations which may slow rollout or complicate tech stacks.
Culture Amp Lattice can be more expensive and less specialized in pure engagement survey design which may matter for culture‑focused teams.
HiBob HRIS Lattice has weaker global HR localization and employment law support which may make it less ideal for international teams.
PerformYard Lattice’s setup and interface feel more complex than PerformYard’s lightweight, feedback‑focused system which may be easier to adopt.

Reviews

  • G2 (Rating: 4.6/5): Reviewers frequently praise structured review cycles, goal visibility, feedback and an approachable interface. Common criticisms concern administrative complexity, customization limits and the cost of combining modules.
  • 💬Software Advice (Rating: 4.5/5): Users value review templates, goal tracking and centralized performance conversations. Less-positive feedback mentions setup effort, reporting or navigation friction and the learning curve for administrators.
  • 💬OutSail: This 2024 buyer-oriented review describes Lattice as a strong performance and engagement platform, while warning that modular costs and administrative complexity should be evaluated carefully. It is dated context rather than the source for current pricing.