- Single checks: Verify individual addresses.
- Bulk checks: Process larger lists for outreach hygiene.
- Credit rollover: The pricing page describes rollover for unused credits.
- Team seats: Higher tiers increase users and credits.
- LinkedIn workflow: Skrapp combines verification with prospect discovery.
Skrapp Email Verifier
Free and accurate email verification for cleaner outreach lists
Updated August 11, 2026
Skrapp Email Verifier Overview
Skrapp combines email finding and verification for sales and recruiting teams. Users can search for business contacts, check individual addresses and process larger outreach lists in bulk.
Its LinkedIn-related workflow helps users discover professional prospects and then verify their contact details. It does not schedule posts or manage social accounts, so the social network is a research source rather than a publishing channel.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 50 credits and 1 user |
| Professional | $29/month billed annually or $39 monthly | 2,000 credits and 2 users |
| Enterprise | $262/month billed annually or $349 monthly | 50,000 credits and 15 users |
The Free plan includes a small recurring allowance and one user. Professional and Enterprise amounts are lower on annual billing than on monthly billing.
Pricing source: Skrapp pricing
Pros
| Compared with | Why this product may fit better |
|---|---|
| Hunter | Hunter is the other option here. Skrapp combines company and contact search with verification and gives the Free plan a small recurring allowance. Teams can research prospects and check addresses in one place without buying a separate validator for early-stage outbound work. |
| Apollo.io | Against Apollo.io, the product is narrower and easier to frame than a full sales-intelligence and engagement platform. A small team that needs verified business emails, not a replacement CRM or sequencer, may reach useful results with less setup. |
| Snov.io | Snov.io takes a different route. Skrapp keeps its core process centered on finding and verifying contacts, with team capacity added on paid plans. Buyers who already have an outreach system can avoid paying for another large campaign-automation layer. |
| Lusha | If Lusha is on the shortlist, bulk search and email verification sit alongside prospect discovery under one credit model. That can suit teams prioritizing email-based research over a wider contact-data package with phone numbers and sales intelligence. |
Cons
| Compared with | Where this product may fall short |
|---|---|
| Hunter | Hunter has a highly recognizable domain-search process and a broad set of integrations around email research. Skrapp should prove its coverage and verification results on the buyer’s actual markets before a lower price or larger allowance decides the comparison. |
| Apollo.io | Considering Apollo.io as well, Apollo supplies a much larger prospect database, filtering system and engagement environment. Skrapp is less appropriate when the project requires account selection, sequences and coordinated sales execution rather than verified email discovery alone. |
| Snov.io | Snov.io includes deeper campaign automation and multichannel outreach in the same product family. Skrapp may leave more exports and integration work for a team that wants to find, verify and contact prospects without switching systems. |
| Lusha | Lusha’s contact-data offering extends beyond email addresses and may better support teams that rely on direct dials or richer sales intelligence. Skrapp’s focused email process is a limitation when the outreach motion uses several contact channels. |
Reviews
- Skrapp reviews on G2: The 4.5/5 profile includes 355 reviews. Feedback covers prospect discovery, verification and bulk-search speed, so readers should separate comments about finding contacts from comments about validator accuracy.
- Skrapp reviews on Capterra: The listing supplies more qualitative product feedback without adding another unverified aggregate. It is part of the Gartner Digital Markets family and is not counted as an independent second pool.
