- Work Order Management: Create, assign, prioritize, and track reactive and preventive work orders from mobile or desktop.
- Asset Management: Centralize asset history, documentation, warranties, and performance data for faster troubleshooting.
- Preventive Maintenance: Schedule PMs with procedures and checklists to reduce downtime and unexpected failures.
- Inventory Management: Track parts usage, set minimum thresholds, and receive alerts to avoid stockouts.
- Mobile-First CMMS: iOS and Android apps allow technicians to work efficiently in the field, even offline on higher plans.
- Analytics & Reporting: Gain visibility into costs, downtime, and performance trends to improve maintenance decisions.
Upkeep Free Maintenance Software
Mobile-first free CMMS for work orders, assets, and preventive maintenance
Updated May 11, 2026
Upkeep Free Maintenance Software Overview
UpKeep Free Maintenance Software is a mobile-first CMMS designed to help maintenance teams manage work orders, assets, and inventory from a single platform.
It offers a truly free plan with unlimited work orders and no expiration, making it suitable for small teams getting started. Scalable paid plans add preventive maintenance optimization, analytics, automation, and enterprise-grade controls.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | $20/user/month (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited work orders, Asset management, Unlimited requester users |
| Premium | $55/user/month (Billed Monthly) | Inventory management & costing, Preventive maintenance optimization, Time & manpower tracking |
| Professional | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Advanced analytics & reporting, Mobile offline mode, Custom request portal |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Workflow automation, Multi-site management, Standard API access & SSO |
Price details: https://upkeep.com/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Fiix | Compared to Fiix, UpKeep is easier to deploy and use, especially for mobile technicians. The free plan with unlimited work orders lowers entry cost, while the interface requires less training. Small teams often find UpKeep faster to adopt without dedicated IT resources. |
| Hippo CMMS | UpKeep offers a stronger mobile experience than Hippo CMMS, with more responsive apps and real-time updates. Pricing is more transparent at entry level, and the free plan makes it easier for organizations to test functionality before committing. |
| MaintainX | Against MaintainX, UpKeep provides deeper asset management and scalability into enterprise use cases. Its analytics, inventory controls, and automation options make it better suited for growing operations that need more than checklist-based maintenance. |
| eMaint | UpKeep is generally more intuitive and less complex than eMaint, reducing setup time and training costs. Teams focused on speed and usability often prefer UpKeep, especially when rolling out CMMS across distributed or non-technical workforces. |
| Limble CMMS | Compared to Limble, UpKeep offers a longer-standing platform with broader enterprise features like APIs, SSO, and multi-site management. Organizations planning to scale often see UpKeep as a more future-proof option. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Fiix | Compared to Fiix, UpKeep can become more expensive as user counts grow, since pricing is per paid user. Fiix may offer more flexibility for complex maintenance hierarchies and highly customized workflows in manufacturing-heavy environments. |
| Hippo CMMS | Hippo CMMS may be more cost-effective for organizations that only need basic desktop-based maintenance tracking. UpKeep’s strongest advantages rely on mobile usage, which may be unnecessary for office-centric teams. |
| MaintainX | MaintainX often feels simpler and more affordable for frontline teams focused on procedures and communication. UpKeep’s interface and feature depth can feel heavier for very small teams that do not need asset-heavy tracking. |
| eMaint | While easier than eMaint, UpKeep offers fewer highly specialized configuration options for regulated industries. Large enterprises with complex compliance or legacy ERP integrations may still prefer eMaint’s depth. |
| Limble CMMS | Limble is often perceived as more modern in UI and faster to configure for small-to-mid teams. UpKeep’s advanced features are powerful, but some users report a learning curve when moving beyond the free or Essential plan. |
Reviews
- coastapp.com Review: The reviewer highlights a “solid mobile experience” that feels fast and intuitive for teams in the field, and notes that assigning and tracking work orders in real time feels straightforward. Automated alerts and reminders help prevent overdue tasks, but limited customization and weaker automations in lower-tier plans make it less suitable for complex workflows.
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.6/5): Upkeep significantly improved maintenance efficiency for one telecommunications team that relies on asset tracking, inventory control, and task scheduling every day. The mobile app allows real-time access anywhere, and users value filtering work orders and attaching photos, though some report slow updates, page refresh issues, and occasional trouble with advanced filtering or large file uploads.
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Upkeep delivers “excellent automation” and handles maintenance requests promptly, which creates a smooth workflow for service coordinators who need documents and preliminary reports in one place. Inventory tracking in an “easy, all-in-one” system replaces paper processes, yet some mention system crashes tied to connectivity and a desire for deeper customization options.
- Reddit r/Entrepreneur: One commenter with experience in the cleaning industry says the app solves “headaches tracking different work orders” and praises the core idea behind speeding up the maintenance work order process.
- Trustpilot Review (Rating: 1.5/5): A reviewer describes an 18‑month membership as having “failed miserably,” citing a specific incident where a salt water cell for a pool failed and dissatisfaction with how the company handled the replacement process.
