- AI Transcription: Converts audio and video recordings into accurate text across 58 languages.
- AI Meeting Summaries: Generates concise summaries with action items and key decisions.
- Bilingual Transcription: Handles meetings where participants speak different languages.
- Meeting Recorder: Records online meetings with high-quality audio and video.
- AI Chat: Allows users to ask questions directly about transcripts and notes.
- Integrations: Connects with tools like Zoom, Slack, Salesforce, Notion, and Zapier.
Notta AI
AI-powered meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual note-taking platform
Updated April 1, 2026
Notta AI Overview
Notta AI is an intelligent note-taking and meeting transcription tool designed to convert audio and video into searchable text in real time. It supports 58 languages, bilingual transcription, AI-generated summaries, and meeting insights.
Suitable for individuals and teams, Notta helps users capture conversations, extract action items, collaborate securely, and integrate notes into existing workflows.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Free Forever) | 120 transcription minutes/month, Web meeting transcription, Speaker identification |
| Pro | $8.17/mo (Billed Annually) | 1,800 minutes/month, Transcript export & translation, Custom vocabulary |
| Business | $16.67/mo (Billed Annually) | Unlimited transcription, CRM & Zapier integrations, Advanced security controls |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing | SAML SSO, Audit logs, Priority support |
| Monolingual Translation Add-on | $6/mo (Billed Annually) / $10/mo (Billed Monthly) | Real-time translation, Up to 100 uses/month, Pro & Business access |
| Bilingual Transcription & Translation Add-on | $9/mo (Billed Annually) / $15/mo (Billed Monthly) | Bilingual meetings support, Up to 200 uses/month, Enterprise unlimited |
Price details: https://www.notta.ai/en/pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Otter.ai | Compared to Otter.ai, Notta offers broader language coverage and bilingual transcription, making it more suitable for global teams. Its pricing is competitive at the Pro level, and the interface feels simpler for first-time users who want quick transcription without extensive setup. |
| Fireflies.ai | Notta is easier to use for manual uploads and quick meeting notes than Fireflies.ai, which is more automation-heavy. Notta’s real-time transcription accuracy and flexible exports appeal to users who want hands-on control without complex workflows. |
| tl;dv | Against tl;dv, Notta provides stronger multilingual transcription and translation features. Teams that operate across regions benefit from Notta’s language support, while still getting summaries and integrations at a comparable annual price point. |
| Fathom | Notta works across more platforms and file types than Fathom, which is heavily focused on Zoom. Notta’s browser, mobile apps, and file transcription make it more versatile for users handling meetings, interviews, and recorded content. |
| Jamie | Compared to Jamie, Notta provides more structured plans and enterprise-grade security options. It suits organizations that need compliance, admin controls, and predictable billing rather than a lightweight personal note-taking assistant. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Otter.ai | Compared to Otter.ai, Notta’s free plan is more restrictive, especially with short per-conversation limits. Users who rely heavily on free transcription may find Otter more forgiving for longer meetings without upgrading. |
| Fireflies.ai | Fireflies.ai offers deeper automated call intelligence and conversation analytics. Notta can feel lighter in advanced sales insights, requiring add-ons or higher plans to approach Fireflies’ level of automation. |
| tl;dv | tl;dv focuses strongly on meeting highlights and video clips. While Notta supports clips, its workflow is more transcript-centric, which may feel less intuitive for teams prioritizing video-first collaboration. |
| Fathom | Fathom’s core features are free for individual users, whereas Notta locks many useful capabilities behind paid tiers. Budget-conscious solo users may find Notta less appealing without committing to a subscription. |
| Jamie | Jamie emphasizes simplicity and generous free usage. Notta’s interface includes more options and settings, which can feel overwhelming for users who want minimal configuration and instant summaries. |
Reviews
- tldv.io Review: Billing complaints dominate, with one person calling the 3-day trial “misleading” because cancellation had to happen within 2 days and another saying they were double-charged with no reply after 6 emails. Several users slam the transcription quality, labeling it “the WORST transcription ever” and pointing to “very poor” Greek results, Portuguese transcripts “riddled with errors,” and inaccurate translations despite praise for multi-language support.
- thebusinessdive.com Review: The reviewer concludes it is a solid choice for transcribing meetings and recordings, highlighting accurate transcriptions, strong collaboration tools, and suitability for professionals or small teams working in international environments. Security also gets a nod with mention of SOC2 Type II certification.
- sonix.ai Review: The article credits Notta AI with saving time through automatic transcription and an AI summarizer that pulls key points and action items for faster meeting recaps. Easy export options like TXT, DOCX, SRT, PDF, and XLSX make sharing simple, and real-time transcription improves accessibility for hearing-impaired participants.
- Trustpilot Review: Trial and billing frustrations appear repeatedly, including a charge of 83 euros after forgetting to cancel and a denied refund for an unused 3-month subscription. A Greek-language test during the 3-day trial produced “very poor” results with language mixing and constant spelling and grammar mistakes, and one reviewer said manual corrections took longer than the transcription itself.
- fritz.ai Review: Speed impresses here, with a 45-minute video transcribed in “2-3 minutes” and accuracy hitting 95–98% for clean audio in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Notta AI earns praise for drag-and-drop uploads, flexible exports like SRT for YouTube subtitles, and a useful Chrome extension, though the 120-minute free plan limit and weaker handling of technical jargon or bad audio draw criticism.
