- Preventive Maintenance Scheduling: Create custom schedules for equipment and vehicles with automatic reminders.
- Work Order Management: Generate, assign, and track maintenance work orders from start to completion.
- Equipment & Asset Tracking: Manage vehicles, trailers, and non-vehicle assets in one dashboard.
- Mobile App Access: Allow technicians and drivers to log maintenance and inspections from the field.
- Reporting & Compliance: Access fleet reports, inspection records, and DOT-compliant forms.
- GPS, Telematics & Safety Add-ons: Monitor location, driver behavior, and safety with optional integrations.
AUTOsist
Easy-to-use equipment and fleet maintenance management for growing operations
Updated May 11, 2026
AUTOsist Overview
AUTOsist Equipment Maintenance Management Software helps businesses track, schedule, and manage maintenance for equipment, vehicles, and mobile assets in one centralized system. Designed for simplicity, it automates preventive maintenance, work orders, inspections, and reminders to reduce downtime and costs.
With mobile apps, reporting, and optional GPS and safety integrations, AUTOsist supports fleets of all sizes.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| All-in Maintenance Package | $6/vehicle/mo (Billed Annually) / $7/vehicle/mo (Billed Monthly). Minimum $59/mo for 5 vehicles. Non-vehicle assets: $3/asset/mo. | Unlimited users and devices, Preventive maintenance schedules, Work orders and inspections |
| All-in Maintenance + GPS & Telematics | $28/vehicle/mo (Billed Annually). 5 vehicle minimum. | GPS tracking with geofencing, Driver behavior metrics, Automatic mileage-based work orders |
| Maintenance + GPS & Telematics + Safety Cameras | $55/vehicle/mo (Billed Annually). 5 vehicle minimum. | Dual-facing HD safety cameras, AI video telematics, Live camera feeds and alerts |
Price details: https://autosist.com/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Fleetio | AUTOsist is generally more affordable for small to mid-sized fleets, with straightforward per-vehicle pricing and fewer feature tiers. Users often find AUTOsist easier to configure and faster to adopt, especially for basic maintenance tracking, without the learning curve associated with Fleetio’s deeper but more complex feature set. |
| Samsara | Compared to Samsara, AUTOsist offers a simpler interface and lower entry cost for maintenance-focused needs. Businesses that do not require heavy enterprise telematics benefit from AUTOsist’s focus on maintenance workflows, mobile usability, and predictable pricing rather than bundled enterprise contracts. |
| UpKeep | AUTOsist is easier for fleet and equipment teams without formal CMMS experience. It focuses specifically on vehicles and mobile assets, making it more intuitive for fleet managers, while UpKeep is broader and often more expensive for comparable multi-user access. |
| Fiix | Fiix is powerful but complex. AUTOsist provides a more approachable solution with quicker setup, lower costs, and less administrative overhead, which suits smaller teams that want maintenance visibility without managing a full enterprise CMMS platform. |
| Simply Fleet | AUTOsist offers stronger customer support, more robust reporting, and scalable add-ons like GPS and safety cameras. While Simply Fleet is lightweight, AUTOsist better supports growing fleets that want maintenance, compliance, and telematics in one ecosystem. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Fleetio | Fleetio provides deeper analytics, integrations, and customization for large fleets. Compared to it, AUTOsist may feel limited for enterprises needing advanced data modeling, extensive third-party integrations, or highly granular reporting across very large, complex operations. |
| Samsara | Samsara offers more advanced real-time telematics, video analytics, and enterprise safety features. AUTOsist’s GPS and camera options are effective but less sophisticated, making it less suitable for organizations prioritizing cutting-edge telematics over maintenance management. |
| UpKeep | UpKeep supports broader asset types and more advanced CMMS workflows. AUTOsist is more fleet-centric, which can be limiting for companies managing complex facilities, production equipment, or non-mobile assets alongside vehicles. |
| Fiix | Fiix includes advanced automation, APIs, and asset hierarchies suited for industrial maintenance. AUTOsist lacks some of these enterprise-grade capabilities, which may be a drawback for highly regulated or process-heavy maintenance environments. |
| Simply Fleet | Simply Fleet can be cheaper for very small teams with minimal needs. AUTOsist’s minimum monthly cost and per-vehicle pricing may feel high for micro-fleets managing only a handful of assets with basic tracking requirements. |
Reviews
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.7/5): One safety specialist shared that AUTOsist made it easy to track regular maintenance and inspections across multiple departments, with reminders and work orders that improved fleet reliability and helped mechanics stay on top of findings until resolution. Another reviewer called it an excellent digital solution for keeping maintenance records, reminders, and inspections together, and highlighted the team’s customer support as “one of, if not the best” they had dealt with.
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.7/5): Autosist keeps all maintenance records in one organized, easy-to-use location, and drivers can complete vehicle inspections and update mileage directly in the system, which simplifies day-to-day tracking.
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.8/5): AUTOsist organized fleet operations for a growing delivery team by tracking maintenance schedules, fuel history, trip logs, and paperwork through both the online tool and mobile app. Custom checklists for items “not in proper working order,” digital inspections, and preventative maintenance reminders earned strong praise, though one reviewer found the reporting filters and data breakdown options tricky when seeking specific formats.
- apple.com Review: After a 5.0 upgrade temporarily hid a current vehicle, persistent back-and-forth emails with the developer restored the data, and the responsive support left a strong impression. Another user valued having notes, photos, and receipts in one place, printing detailed vehicle reports for warranty claims, and accessing records from both the app and a laptop, even though initial setup took some time.
- softwareconnect.com Review: Managing 11 vehicles shifted from juggling Excel spreadsheets, QuickBooks, and Outlook reminders to a single system where mechanics log repairs as they work and upload photos and receipts from the field. One company appreciated avoiding any tracker installation or monthly per-vehicle fee while maintaining forklifts and trailers, and another praised fast customer service that quickly resolved issues, though slow user connections and the need to open Vehicle Details to see year and make drew minor criticism.
